Marketplace · skill · Legal
SOC 2 Audit Prep
Checks readiness before a SOC 2 Type II observation period and lists the controls and evidence still missing. A drafting aid for a lawyer or compliance lead to review. Not legal advice.
Credit: Alireza Rezvani, claude-skills
A drafting and review aid for lawyers and compliance teams. It does not give legal advice, and a qualified lawyer should check anything it produces before it is relied on or sent.
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2025 Alireza Rezvani
License: MIT · License file
These instructions are too long for a prefilled chat link. Copy them into your app or download the file. A chat link does not install the skill or its required tools. Check the source for setup instructions and supporting files.
Hosted copy
This file is the upstream SKILL.md as of commit 6d2f02e (Oct 23, 2026). Credit stays with Alireza Rezvani, claude-skills. The license is MIT.
The download and the copy button add a short attribution block at the end: source, copyright, and license.
Download SKILL.md License file
---
name: "soc2-audit-prep"
description: "/compliance-os:soc2-audit-prep [scope] — SOC 2 Type II readiness 6-question forcing interrogation. Observation-period focused. Use before Type II observation begins, mid-period checkpoint, or pre-field-test month-10 readiness."
---
# /compliance-os:soc2-audit-prep — SOC 2 Type II Forcing Questions
**Command:** `/compliance-os:soc2-audit-prep <scope>`
The SOC 2 Type II auditor pressure-tests any SOC 2 work. Six observation-period-disciplined questions before any Type II cycle.
## When to Run
- Pre-observation period (months 1-2 of cycle)
- Mid-observation period (month 6 checkpoint)
- Pre-field-test (month 10)
- Post-report (planning next cycle)
- After scope change (adding TSC category)
- After major incident during observation period
## The Six SOC 2 Type II Questions
### 1. What's the scope, and which TSC categories are in?
**Security always required; others elective based on customer ask.**
- Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) under Security always
- Availability (A1): for SaaS with SLA commitments
- Processing Integrity (PI1): for systems processing transactional / financial data
- Confidentiality (C1): for systems handling proprietary / confidential data
- Privacy (P1-P8): for systems handling personal data (overlap with GDPR if applicable)
- AICPA AT-C 205 description of system: complete + accurate + boundaries clear
### 2. Did any control skip a cycle during observation period?
**Type II requires consistent operation — single skipped cycle = likely exception.**
- Quarterly controls (e.g., access reviews): all 4 quarters covered
- Monthly controls (e.g., vulnerability scans): all months covered
- Continuous controls (e.g., logging): no gaps during period
- Annual controls (e.g., BCP exercises, training): completed within period
### 3. Show me the change-management evidence for any control implemented mid-period.
**Mid-period changes = high audit risk.**
- New controls implemented during observation: documented with change-management
- Modified controls: rationale + effective date + impact on prior samples
- Removed controls: rationale + customer impact assessment
- Strategy: avoid mid-period changes; defer to next cycle
### 4. Where's the exception log, and what's the materiality assessment?
**Real-time exception logging — not retroactive.**
- Each exception logged when discovered, not at audit time
- Per exception: what / when / impact / remediation / owner
- Materiality assessment: does the exception affect overall control operation?
- Audit firm threshold: typically 1-2 exceptions per control acceptable; 3+ = finding
### 5. Show me sample evidence from each TSC criterion in the FIRST month of observation.
**Not the last week — the first month.**
- Audit firm samples across the observation period
- Front-loaded evidence demonstrates operational discipline
- Back-loaded evidence (last 30 days) = "scrambling" signal
- Sample IDs should be reproducible from operational systems
### 6. What's the cross-walk to ISO 27001, and which evidence reuses?
**75% control overlap — the canonical pair.**
- Run `cross_framework_mapper.py` for HIGH-confidence overlap themes
- Each shared artefact cited by both audits (one collection, two reports)
- Coordinate audit calendar with cs-ciso-iso27001
- Avoid producing duplicate evidence files for same control
## Workflow
```bash
# 1. Scoping + gap analysis (pre-observation)
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance/scripts/gap_analyzer.py current_state.json
# 2. Control matrix with ISO 27001 cross-walk
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance/scripts/control_matrix_builder.py program.json
# 3. Continuous evidence tracking (during observation)
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance/scripts/evidence_tracker.py evidence_log.json
# 4. Mock audit (pre-field-test month 10)
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/audit_simulator.py soc2_scope.json
```
## Output Format
```markdown
# SOC 2 Type II Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Observation Period:** YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[scoping | pre-observation | observation-status | pre-field | report-response]
## TSC Scope
- Security: included
- Availability: <yes/no>
- Processing Integrity: <yes/no>
- Confidentiality: <yes/no>
- Privacy: <yes/no>
## Observation Period Status
- Months elapsed: N / 12
- Controls operated consistently: % of total
- Cycle skips identified: <list>
- Mid-period control changes: N (each documented with change-mgmt: yes/no)
## Exception Log
- Total exceptions logged: N
- Per-control max exceptions: M (audit firm tolerance: typically 1-2)
- Material exceptions (overall control affected): <list>
- Remediation status per exception: complete/in-progress
## Sample Evidence Coverage
- Month 1-3 evidence: complete/gaps
- Month 4-6 evidence: complete/gaps
- Month 7-9 evidence: complete/gaps
- Month 10-12 evidence: complete/gaps (only for pre-report status)
## ISO 27001 Cross-Walk Reuse
- HIGH-confidence overlap themes: N
- Shared artefacts in evidence pool: <count>
- Duplicate evidence collection avoided: % savings
## Audit Firm Readiness
- Scoping discussion: complete/pending
- Description of system per AT-C 205: complete/pending
- Walkthrough rehearsal: complete/pending
- Sample preparation: complete/pending
## Verdict
🟢 ON-TRACK | 🟡 NEEDS-ATTENTION | 🔴 MATERIAL-RISK
## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + observation-period timing]
```
## Routing
- `/compliance-os:compliance-readiness` — for multi-framework view
- `/compliance-os:iso27001-audit-prep` — for ISO 27001 cross-walk pair (75% overlap)
- `/compliance-os:gdpr-audit-prep` — for Privacy TSC overlap
- `/c-level-agents:ciso-review` — for executive cybersecurity strategy
## Related
- Agent: [`cs-soc2-auditor`](../../agents/cs-soc2-auditor.md)
- Skill: [`soc2-compliance`](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance/SKILL.md)
- Playbook: [soc2_audit_playbook.md](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance/references/soc2_audit_playbook.md)
- Adjacent: `../iso27001-audit-prep/`, `../gdpr-audit-prep/`, `../compliance-readiness/`
---
**Version:** 1.0.0
Know a good one? Submit it.
YourAIKit products are workflow tools. They are not legal, tax, or financial advice.